Skip to main content

Bird Box: Barcelona Review

 


It is evident antichrist writers and directors are at work. The original Bird Box starring Sandra Bullock was a cleaver apocalyptic film that did not mock any religion or eschatological viewpoint. In fact, it respected all religious views  and mythologies. The sequel is the antithesis, it features cultists who believe that making people see The Creatures is an act of instituting the Christian Rapture. The protagonist, Sebastian, even sees souls fly into heavens when he makes them see the suicide inducing creatures. Sebastian is very Catholic, giving his daughter and another girl a Seraphim angel medallion which features six wings. Sebastin who sees his daughter is controlled in his Catholic faith to believe killing people via making them see the Entities will make him finally be with his daughter again. The main antagonist is a Catholic Priest who draws the Eye of Horus and Anubis (All Seeing Eye) on foreheads and calls it the Lord’s work to make people see the angels (creatures) and commit suicide. The film not only demonizes Catholic & Christian beliefs, it undermines the premise of the first film, that this is not a virus, but some entity (creatures) that when seen makes good people slay themselves as they hear dead relatives and makes psychopaths and mentally ill servants, Barcelona amends servants and calls them seers who can see The Creatures and obey them or not. Instead of psychos and mentally ill being servants of The Entities like in the first Bird Box, its traumatized people who’s DNA has changed from trauma that become seers. Again altering lore because the writers are too lazy to connect this Barcelona tale with The American original. 


The original Bird Box is a classic, the cast was perfect and settings of a house, woods, hospital, and etc allowed the suspense to build and ebb at the right intervals. Barcelona feels like a bad fan fiction and something Robert Rodriguez would make with its Once Upon A Time In Mexico vibes. The protagonist Sebastian you do not root for like Malory (Sandra Bullock) in the first film because until the final act Sebastian is a villain killing people from a mad quasi-Catholic Creatures religion. It was better in first film when the cultists and seers treated The Creatures as unique religion, “You need to see! It will cleanse the world.” Reminds me of children’s hymn “be careful what your little eyes see,” and our Lord’s words, “The eye is the lamp of the body. You draw light into your body through your eyes, and light shines out to the world through your eyes. So if your eye is well and shows you what is true, then your whole body will be filled with light. But if your eye is clouded or evil, then your body will be filled with evil and dark clouds. And the darkness that takes over the body of a child of God who has gone astray—that is the deepest, darkest darkness there is.” (Matthew 6:22-24). In Barcelona it is blended with Catholicism and Christianity making it not palpable, and offensive to estimated 3.3 Billion people on earth!  Including me! I hated how this Bird Box sequel makes Christian beliefs creepy and insane looking via The Priest Seer and The Protagonist rapturing people by making them look at the suicide inducing supernatural creatures. 


Bird Box built a very believable world with a threat that terrifies, and rules like wear a blind fold, birds sense them (oh but in Barceloma animals can be controlled by the Creatures like birds who go kamikaze!) that made it engrossing, that combined with a great cast made it work. Barcelona is a b-movie that takes elements of Bird Box, and contradicts lore and makes it a Resident Evil rip off. Before The Creatures are supernatural, in this sequel they are virus that may have a cure.. ugh everything has to be a virus post-Covid. The action is grungy and a lot of the film is incoherent and antichrist.  While I enjoyed the original Bird Box, this film is so bad in comparison that I cannot say pass on streaming it more! Its horrid, painting Catholic/Christianity in a bad light via the protagonist and antagonist, and it contradicts all the lore of the first film: creatures turned into virus (though they say they could be Quantum beings, the ending goes for virus explanation and banks on it), Cult of the Creature becomes Church and Cult hybrid, that the Entities use anything to control you if you become a seer: god, devil, angels, and etc when the first movie says its the mentally il, murderers, and psychotic people who become seers worshipping The Creatures as they really are, and the birds sense and can see The Creatures in the first, but in Barcelona they can become suicidal like humans who see The Entities. 


I highly recommend you avoid this Satanic film. It will attempt to insert lies in your mind about your faith and make the things of the church seem creepy and mentally ill. We should not support films that try to undermine and demonize faith. Amen. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Israel’s Conquest of Canaan: The Nephilim and Giants

  Christianity Today asserts that the conquest of Canaan can be a “stumbling block” for believers. This probably is because of a foolish idea of comparing it to a modern conquest happening in our world. The truth is that God had Israel conquer Canaan because it was ruled by evil giants, “We saw the Nephilim there (the descendants of Anak come from the Nephilim). We seemed like grasshoppers in our own eyes, and we looked the same to them.” (Numbers 13:33). These are Anakim or Nephilim, the children of angels and human women, “When man began to multiply on the face of the land and daughters were born to them, the sons of God (angels) saw that the daughters of man were attractive. And they took as their wives any they chose. Then the LORD said, “My Spirit shall not abide in man forever, for he is flesh: his days shall be 120 years.” The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of man and they bore children to them. These w

Dispensationalism

John Nelson Darby (1800-1882) was a man who did two things, he took 70th week of the Book of Daniel and stretched out to the End Times, and he was the father of  Dispensationalism , a belief system that God dispenses different peoples with separate blessings and covenants. According to Darb'ys doctrine of Dispensationalism, God dispenses different covenants. There are total of seven dispensations that divide the history of man: I. Dispensation of Innocence (prior to the Fall, "Do not east of the Fruit of Good and Eve, Eden), II. Dispensation of Conscience ( You must assuage guilt and sin with blood sacrifices.) III. Dispensation of Human Government (Multiply and Subdue the world, example the Tower of Babel Gen 11:1-9, and Genesis 1:28). IV. Dispensation of the Promise (Dwell in Canaan, Jerusalem) V. Dispensation of the Law ("Obey the Law of Moses and the Prophets"). VI. Dispensation of Grace (The Church, Jesus Christ has come and died for our sins an

Jesus’ Name in Aramaic

There has been a trend to render Jesus’ name Hebrew, יֵשׁוּעַ , Yeshua. The problem is neither Christ nor his apostles, nor the Jews in 30-33 A.D. spoke Hebrew, they spoke Aramaic. A ramaic is the oldest language on earth and was the language Jesus spoke. In fact, the oldest Old Testament is the Septuagint a Greco translation around 132 B.C.E. (165 Years Before Christ)that was translated from Aramaic. The Masoretic Text, The Hebrew Old Testament most Bibles use, dates from 7th to 10th Century A.D. (Medieval Times).  This translation does not cross reference with the words of Christ in the New Testament which are Aramaic and Koine Greek.  If the Aramaic was what Jesus spoke, then by what name would have been called? Jesus’ name in Aramaic is Isho or Eesho, spelled ܝܫܘܥ . That is the name of our Lord in Aramaic! He would have heard his name in this dialect, “Hail Isho or Eesho!” as well as the Greek, Ἰ ησο ῦ ς , Iesous.  Aramaic is disappearing, only a few people are endeavo