Skip to main content

Rave in the Nave

 


There have been some serious desecrations of churches. In Speyer, Germany at Memorial Church where German Princes defended the evangelical and protestant faith in 1529 against an imperial ban, a Muslim Imam was allowed to make the Muslim call to prayer in the church, with only one woman protesting (https://www2.cbn.com/news/world/brave-german-woman-rebukes-islams-lie).So when other churches begin to have any seemingly secular services, fears rise that Paul words are indeed happening, “They will consider nothing sacred” (2 Timothy 3:2 NLT). The latest was a rave in the nave of Canterbury Cathedral, which is seat of The Archbishop of Canterbury, the bishop who coronates kings and queens of England. This was a silent rave, which means that the youths wore headphones listening to Disco music transmitted to headsets. The effect for anyone entering without headphones would be people dancing to nothing. 


The Church is claiming that raves like this are meant to raise revenue to save the nave. It is no secret that Christianity is in decline in The UK, and to preserve and restore these historical churches requires patronage and these kind of events.  This makes sense from fiscal point of view, but protesters claim this is a form of desecration. I do wonder where their outrage was when churches were converted into bars and Yoga studios. But to be fair Canterbury is the Vatican of Anglicanism, so the ire and concern is more concentrated, fearing this will further erode the seriousness of faith. 


“On the other hand..” as Tavia says, youths rock’in out in a religious setting could make Episcopalianism more attractive and modern, and what parent wouldn’t prefer their children raving in a cathedral over those seedy underground clubs? I mean you cannot cry despair over youths becoming nones (irreligious, no faith) and then when they finally enter a cathedral call them sacrilegious and expect the youth to be endeared to the Church. Perhaps Jesus would say, “suffer the teens come to me, and rave in my resplendent [cathedral] nave.” We cannot ignore that irreligion is becoming the dominate religious preference, and so Archbishop Welby is no doubt trying to shore up a fastly changing religious landscape. 


I do understand the concern of the sacred being dwarfed by spectacle. You don’t see Mosques, Hindu Temples, and other places sacred to those religions converted temporarily into secular raves. One could argue this kind of “Seeker Friendly” approach will only make the holy more irrelevant, putting  the lid on the coffin of Christianity in Europe, not holding the lid up as intended. The verse by St. Paul seems like bell ringing over these events, “For people will love only themselves and their money. They will be boastful and proud, scoffing at God, disobedient to their parents, and ungrateful. They will consider nothing sacred.” (2 Timothy 3:2). But is this rave a fulfillment of that Scripture? Or what if instead of Disco it was worship music? What if youths could have glow sticks and headsets and blast modern Christian music and bands like Skillet as they dance in Cathedrals. I say that would be an epic alternative for youth groups and there would be no concern of a lack of respect or defilement. On the other hand, I would say that raves like this I would be concerned about potential Satanists trying to defile cathedrals, since Satanism is on the rise in the UK blasting in their headset chants to demons and to devils as they silently do ritual with others in the rave. At least with public music you know the content, what is playing on the DJ’s record. 


Ultimately the pros and cons of this kind of hosting will be debated. The camp that sees this as eroding the sacred for entertainment and the love of money have a point, and those who think its better to have youths hosted in a church than going to clubs has some sense. The delicate balance is not to bring sin or wicked behavior into holy places, but at the same time considering new ways to turn once packed stone cathedrals into a place for 21st Century people to connect with the faith has merit too. Amen. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Israel’s Conquest of Canaan: The Nephilim and Giants

  Christianity Today asserts that the conquest of Canaan can be a “stumbling block” for believers. This probably is because of a foolish idea of comparing it to a modern conquest happening in our world. The truth is that God had Israel conquer Canaan because it was ruled by evil giants, “We saw the Nephilim there (the descendants of Anak come from the Nephilim). We seemed like grasshoppers in our own eyes, and we looked the same to them.” (Numbers 13:33). These are Anakim or Nephilim, the children of angels and human women, “When man began to multiply on the face of the land and daughters were born to them, the sons of God (angels) saw that the daughters of man were attractive. And they took as their wives any they chose. Then the LORD said, “My Spirit shall not abide in man forever, for he is flesh: his days shall be 120 years.” The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of man and they bore children to them. The...

Dispensationalism

John Nelson Darby (1800-1882) was a man who did two things, he took 70th week of the Book of Daniel and stretched out to the End Times, and he was the father of  Dispensationalism , a belief system that God dispenses different peoples with separate blessings and covenants. According to Darb'ys doctrine of Dispensationalism, God dispenses different covenants. There are total of seven dispensations that divide the history of man: I. Dispensation of Innocence (prior to the Fall, "Do not east of the Fruit of Good and Eve, Eden), II. Dispensation of Conscience ( You must assuage guilt and sin with blood sacrifices.) III. Dispensation of Human Government (Multiply and Subdue the world, example the Tower of Babel Gen 11:1-9, and Genesis 1:28). IV. Dispensation of the Promise (Dwell in Canaan, Jerusalem) V. Dispensation of the Law ("Obey the Law of Moses and the Prophets"). VI. Dispensation of Grace (The Church, Jesus Christ has come...

Jesus’ Name in Aramaic

There has been a trend to render Jesus’ name Hebrew, יֵשׁוּעַ , Yeshua. The problem is neither Christ nor his apostles, nor the Jews in 30-33 A.D. spoke Hebrew, they spoke Aramaic. A ramaic is the oldest language on earth and was the language Jesus spoke. In fact, the oldest Old Testament is the Septuagint a Greco translation around 132 B.C.E. (165 Years Before Christ)that was translated from Aramaic. The Masoretic Text, The Hebrew Old Testament most Bibles use, dates from 7th to 10th Century A.D. (Medieval Times).  This translation does not cross reference with the words of Christ in the New Testament which are Aramaic and Koine Greek.  If the Aramaic was what Jesus spoke, then by what name would have been called? Jesus’ name in Aramaic is Isho or Eesho, spelled ܝܫܘܥ . That is the name of our Lord in Aramaic! He would have heard his name in this dialect, “Hail Isho or Eesho!” as well as the Greek, Ἰ ησο ῦ ς , Iesous.  Aramaic is disappearing, only a few peop...