Skip to main content

Prayer Books: Are They Useful?


I grew up in Non-Denominational and Charismatic churches, ergo we did not have prayer books like The Anglicans, Lutherans, and Catholics. I am accustom to prayer being intimacy with our Lord Christ and talking to him. A prayer book to me seemed formal and perhaps akin to prayer by rote, “And praying, do not use vain repetitions like the pagans, for they think that in their many words they will be heard” (Matthew 6:7). Prayer books risk being repetitious and for this reason I have often avoided them. 

One day under heavy mind attack, I took the Apostle’s Creed and read it aloud, the thoughts that plagued me silenced. I discovered in that moment reading Scripture, a Creed or even Prayer was not to preform repetitious prayer to make our Great God and Savior hear our entreaties, but rather it is for us believers, to affirm the truths of our faith and recite them in moment that our minds are clouded with uncertainty, mind attacks from the accuser of the brethren and more. I saw the benefit of reading aloud the creeds and prayers because they encourage my faith and act as a tool to quiet the worries in our hearts and minds. 

My tune about prayer books has thus changed. I still hold to that you should bot use them as a means to get God to budge on something or use them in place of personal prayer with you speaking to God. But in times of duress and onslaught from the powers of this present darkness (Ephesians 6:12), I do recommend reading aloud the Creeds, Scriptures, and Prayers. I will say avoid The Book of Common Prayer used on Anglican and Roman Catholic Churches. In that particular book of prayer there are antichrist prayers to the Madonna and Saints, “There is one God, and One mediator between God and man, The Son of Man Jesus Christ.” (1 Timothy 2:5). Instead I recommend The Moravian Book of Prayer (Moravian Daily Texts 2019 App on Apple iStore) or The Lutheran Book of Prayer, preferably an older edition .  

There is a tension, Christ said do not do repetitious prayer, “And praying, do not use vain repetitions like the pagans, for they think that in their many words they will be heard” (Matthew 6:7), which actually is empty phrases, but he does say to keep praying earnestly in a parable, “Then Jesus told his disciples a parable to show them that they should always pray and not give up. He said: “In a certain town there was a judge who neither feared God nor cared what people thought.  And there was a widow in that town who kept coming to him with the plea, ‘Grant me justice against my adversary.’ “For some time he refused. But finally he said to himself, ‘Even though I don’t fear God or care what people think,  yet because this widow keeps bothering me, I will see that she gets justice, so that she won’t eventually come and attack me!’”And the Lord said, “Listen to what the unjust judge says. And will not God bring about justice for his chosen ones, who cry out to him day and night? Will he keep putting them off? I tell you, he will see that they get justice, and quickly. However, when the Son of Man comes,will he find faith on the earth?”” (Luke 18:1-8) and He did say, “You can ask for anything in my name, and I will do it, so that the Son can bring glory to the Father.” (John 14:13). We have to understand there is a difference between empty repetitious prayer and being persistent in prayer,  our hearts are the marker of which a prayer really is, if we say in a dazed stare “Our father in heaven..” due to repeating it so much we are in empty prayer, but if we are praying with great fervor for a miracle day after day that is persistent  prayer.  


Prayer Books can be useful, especially for those struggling to pray or under deep distress and unable to think of what to pray. However prayer books should not be a substituted for communal prayer (quality time) with Christ, and talking to Him and listening. Prayer books are a tool, but not a replacement for our own conversation with The Holy Trinity. Amen. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Israel’s Conquest of Canaan: The Nephilim and Giants

  Christianity Today asserts that the conquest of Canaan can be a “stumbling block” for believers. This probably is because of a foolish idea of comparing it to a modern conquest happening in our world. The truth is that God had Israel conquer Canaan because it was ruled by evil giants, “We saw the Nephilim there (the descendants of Anak come from the Nephilim). We seemed like grasshoppers in our own eyes, and we looked the same to them.” (Numbers 13:33). These are Anakim or Nephilim, the children of angels and human women, “When man began to multiply on the face of the land and daughters were born to them, the sons of God (angels) saw that the daughters of man were attractive. And they took as their wives any they chose. Then the LORD said, “My Spirit shall not abide in man forever, for he is flesh: his days shall be 120 years.” The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of man and they bore children to them. These w

Dispensationalism

John Nelson Darby (1800-1882) was a man who did two things, he took 70th week of the Book of Daniel and stretched out to the End Times, and he was the father of  Dispensationalism , a belief system that God dispenses different peoples with separate blessings and covenants. According to Darb'ys doctrine of Dispensationalism, God dispenses different covenants. There are total of seven dispensations that divide the history of man: I. Dispensation of Innocence (prior to the Fall, "Do not east of the Fruit of Good and Eve, Eden), II. Dispensation of Conscience ( You must assuage guilt and sin with blood sacrifices.) III. Dispensation of Human Government (Multiply and Subdue the world, example the Tower of Babel Gen 11:1-9, and Genesis 1:28). IV. Dispensation of the Promise (Dwell in Canaan, Jerusalem) V. Dispensation of the Law ("Obey the Law of Moses and the Prophets"). VI. Dispensation of Grace (The Church, Jesus Christ has come and died for our sins an

Jesus’ Name in Aramaic

There has been a trend to render Jesus’ name Hebrew, יֵשׁוּעַ , Yeshua. The problem is neither Christ nor his apostles, nor the Jews in 30-33 A.D. spoke Hebrew, they spoke Aramaic. A ramaic is the oldest language on earth and was the language Jesus spoke. In fact, the oldest Old Testament is the Septuagint a Greco translation around 132 B.C.E. (165 Years Before Christ)that was translated from Aramaic. The Masoretic Text, The Hebrew Old Testament most Bibles use, dates from 7th to 10th Century A.D. (Medieval Times).  This translation does not cross reference with the words of Christ in the New Testament which are Aramaic and Koine Greek.  If the Aramaic was what Jesus spoke, then by what name would have been called? Jesus’ name in Aramaic is Isho or Eesho, spelled ܝܫܘܥ . That is the name of our Lord in Aramaic! He would have heard his name in this dialect, “Hail Isho or Eesho!” as well as the Greek, Ἰ ησο ῦ ς , Iesous.  Aramaic is disappearing, only a few people are endeavo