Skip to main content

A Very Puritan Christmas


In the 17th Century the religious sect of Puritans banned Christmas in England. The offense of having holly in your home or singing a Christmas carol was five shillings which back then equates to our modern money as £28.44 which $36.39 USD! That is 28 pounds or 36 dollars every time you are caught by the Puritan Prohibition Police for singing a carol or harboring Christmas contraband like a evergreen tree! 

The Puritan zeal against paganisms in the Christmas holiday were not without merit. The Winter Solstice celebrated by Norse and Druids, and the Romans called it Saturnalia (worship of the sun god, Soli or Saturn). When the Puritans mention Satanic elements in the prohibition they are referring to left overs from paganism like the wreaths which were used to worship Roman and Norse gods, and the bringing into a house the fir tree as the Druid Occultists did and which the Puritans probably cited, “Even their children go to worship at their pagan altars and Asherah poles, beneath every green tree and on every high hill” (Jeremiah 17:2 NLT). The concern the Puritans had about pagan stealth influences was not unwarranted; the Romanite Church had adopted many pagan rites and co-opted them into Christian feasts, Christmas being one of them. In fact, the Emperor Constantine worshipped Sol Invictus (sun god) whose holiday is the Winter Solstice, i.e. Christmas and it seems he was confused between the difference between the True Son of God Jesus Christ who created the sun and all things (John 1:3, Colossians 1:16-18) and the false pagan sun god. Only later at the Council of Nicea would Constantine get a more thorough education on Christianity, that Jesus Christ is Son of God and God Incarnate, One with the Father God and Holy Spirit God who is the LORD God of Israel (Genesis 1:26-2) who is not the pagan-sun god named Saturn.  Saturn is in fact Satan, “And no wonder, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light.” (1 Corinthians 11:14). 

The Puritans sought to purify society and they failed. Like the prohibition of alcohol in 1920-1933 which actually made distillers richer, the Puritan ban on Christmas caused a resurgence of interest in the holiday and possibly has led to legacy it has today. The lesson is prohibition activates the human counter response of wanting it. The Puritans should not have tried to legislate a ban on Christmas, but preach in churches why Xmas can be harmful due to its pagan roots and leave the call to prohibit or not to the individual. This is why the Puritans lost England forever and why they had to try North America. They focused too much on outward holiness and less on the grace of Christ (John 3:16-18, John 6:40, Romans 10:9-10, Acts 15:1-11) and inward holiness that only comes from faith in Jesus (Philippians 3:9). 

The moral is the Puritans were not in error to pick at the paganistic influences and warn Christians, but how they went about it was overkill and closed the ears and hearts of people to use Discernment, “Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God. For many false prophets have gone out into the world. By this you will know the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesses that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, and every spirit that does not confess Jesusa is not from God. This is the spirit of the antichrist, which you have heard is coming, and is already in the world at this time” (1 John 4:1-3).  


While I do not wish to urge a prohibition of Christmas. I do believe we should be wary of paganisms entering our lives in the guise of Xmas folklore and Christmas decor. I urge discernment and to test anything with Scripture and this simple equation, “does this draw attention to Christ or attention away from Christ (called antichrist); does it make me feel closer to Christ or further from Christ?” Amen.  


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Israel’s Conquest of Canaan: The Nephilim and Giants

  Christianity Today asserts that the conquest of Canaan can be a “stumbling block” for believers. This probably is because of a foolish idea of comparing it to a modern conquest happening in our world. The truth is that God had Israel conquer Canaan because it was ruled by evil giants, “We saw the Nephilim there (the descendants of Anak come from the Nephilim). We seemed like grasshoppers in our own eyes, and we looked the same to them.” (Numbers 13:33). These are Anakim or Nephilim, the children of angels and human women, “When man began to multiply on the face of the land and daughters were born to them, the sons of God (angels) saw that the daughters of man were attractive. And they took as their wives any they chose. Then the LORD said, “My Spirit shall not abide in man forever, for he is flesh: his days shall be 120 years.” The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of man and they bore children to them. The...
Post a Comment
Read more

Dispensationalism

John Nelson Darby (1800-1882) was a man who did two things, he took 70th week of the Book of Daniel and stretched out to the End Times, and he was the father of  Dispensationalism , a belief system that God dispenses different peoples with separate blessings and covenants. According to Darb'ys doctrine of Dispensationalism, God dispenses different covenants. There are total of seven dispensations that divide the history of man: I. Dispensation of Innocence (prior to the Fall, "Do not east of the Fruit of Good and Eve, Eden), II. Dispensation of Conscience ( You must assuage guilt and sin with blood sacrifices.) III. Dispensation of Human Government (Multiply and Subdue the world, example the Tower of Babel Gen 11:1-9, and Genesis 1:28). IV. Dispensation of the Promise (Dwell in Canaan, Jerusalem) V. Dispensation of the Law ("Obey the Law of Moses and the Prophets"). VI. Dispensation of Grace (The Church, Jesus Christ has come...
Post a Comment
Read more

Jesus’ Name in Aramaic

There has been a trend to render Jesus’ name Hebrew, יֵשׁוּעַ , Yeshua. The problem is neither Christ nor his apostles, nor the Jews in 30-33 A.D. spoke Hebrew, they spoke Aramaic. A ramaic is the oldest language on earth and was the language Jesus spoke. In fact, the oldest Old Testament is the Septuagint a Greco translation around 132 B.C.E. (165 Years Before Christ)that was translated from Aramaic. The Masoretic Text, The Hebrew Old Testament most Bibles use, dates from 7th to 10th Century A.D. (Medieval Times).  This translation does not cross reference with the words of Christ in the New Testament which are Aramaic and Koine Greek.  If the Aramaic was what Jesus spoke, then by what name would have been called? Jesus’ name in Aramaic is Isho or Eesho, spelled ܝܫܘܥ . That is the name of our Lord in Aramaic! He would have heard his name in this dialect, “Hail Isho or Eesho!” as well as the Greek, Ἰ ησο ῦ ς , Iesous.  Aramaic is disappearing, only a few peop...
Post a Comment
Read more