Skip to main content

To Marry or Not To Marry That Tis The Question


There is a tendency to consider anything Post-Apostolic (100 A.D. and beyond) to Pre-Reformation (100-1600 A.D.) as "a form of godliness," or "manmade religion." Those in post Reformation churches judge the ascetics, monks, and nuns as creations by the Roman and Eastern Orthodox Churches. However, the truth is that monasticism has roots in the Holy Scriptures. The Apostle Paul lays a framework for remaining single in the service of Christ, if at all possible, "To the unmarried and the widows I say that it is good for them to remain single as I am. But if they cannot exercise self-control, they should marry. For it is better to marry than to burn with passion." (1 Corinthians 7:8-9). The Apostle Paul builds on this case for remaining celibate (though he does not stress it as a rule or requirement for believers), "I think that in view of the present distress it is good for a person to remain as he is. Are you bound to a wife? Do not seek to be free. Are you free from a wife? Do not seek a wife. But if you do marry, you have not sinned, and if a betrothed woman marries, she has not sinned. Yet those who marry will have worldly troubles, and I would spare you that." (1 Cor:26-28). The Apostle Paul drives this home with these words, "I want you to be free from anxieties. The unmarried man is anxious about the things of the Lord, how to please the Lord.  But the married man is anxious about worldly things, how to please his wife, and his interests are divided. And the unmarried or betrothed woman is anxious about the things of the Lord, how to be holy in body and spirit. But the married woman is anxious about worldly things, how to please her husband. I say this for your own benefit, not to lay any restraint upon you, but to promote good order and to secure your undivided devotion to the Lord." (1 Cor 32-35). Paul is not trying to destroy matrimony, nor has he made this a rule for believers, but rather a suggestion, that if possible a person deny their passions (if they have the self control, if not they should marry) so that they can whole heartily serve the Lord Jesus Christ without hindrance or encumbrance.

I recently saw an episode of "Arranged" a television series that follows couples who had arranged marriages. In this particular episode, there was Jewish couple, Christian-Texan couple, and Hindu-Indian couple. What became apparent was that marriage is a struggle, not an endless Hallmark movie, romance novel, or fairytale of happily ever after. The honeymoon phase is exactly that, a phase. Those entering matrimony are learning what Paul says, "The husband should give to his wife her conjugal rights, and likewise the wife to her husband. For the wife does not have authority over her own body, but the husband does. Likewise the husband does not have authority over his own body, but the wife does. Do not deprive one another, except perhaps by agreement for a limited time, that you may devote yourselves to prayer; but then come together again, so that Satan may not tempt you because of your lack of self-control." (1 Cor 7:3-4), and "Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything. For husbands, this means love your wives, just as Christ loved the church. He gave up his life for her to make her holy and clean, washed by the cleansing of God's word. In the same way, husbands ought to love their wives as they love their own bodies. For a man who loves his wife actually shows love for himself. No one hates his own body but feeds and cares for it, just as Christ cares for the church. For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh." (Ephesians 5:24-26, 28-29, 31).Marriage comes with a cost for both, wives submitting and husbands so loving their wives that they lay down their lives for her in not only a literal way, but in their choices, if watching sports all day or smoking is hurting your wife, you must put it to death and thus show love.

The point is that the Apostle Paul urges people in the "time of distress" to abstain if it is within the realm of possibility, from marriage and passion and instead use the time in service of Triune God. Its not a rule, but in these dark and last days it become more potent in its address. We can now understand why in Middle Ages, many men and women advocated for becoming celibate monks and nuns to live free of the yoke of matrimony. While there are blessings that come from the yoke of marriage, like intimacy and offspring; there are also blessings from yoke of celibacy like freedom and unbridled energy for things of God. Ultimately, the Apostle Paul says choose, "To the unmarried and the widows I say that it is good for them to remain single as I am. But if they cannot exercise self-control, they should marry. For it is better to marry than to burn with passion," (1 Cor 7:8-9), "Only let each person lead the life that the Lord has assigned to him, and to which God has called him. This is my rule in all the churches," (verse 17), "anyone thinks that he is not behaving properly toward his betrothed, if his passions are strong, and it has to be, let him do as he wishes: let them marry—it is no sin. But whoever is firmly established in his heart, being under no necessity but having his desire under control, and has determined this in his heart, to keep her as his betrothed, he will do well. So then he who marries his betrothed does well, and he who refrains from marriage will do even better." (1 Corinthians 7:36-38).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Israel’s Conquest of Canaan: The Nephilim and Giants

  Christianity Today asserts that the conquest of Canaan can be a “stumbling block” for believers. This probably is because of a foolish idea of comparing it to a modern conquest happening in our world. The truth is that God had Israel conquer Canaan because it was ruled by evil giants, “We saw the Nephilim there (the descendants of Anak come from the Nephilim). We seemed like grasshoppers in our own eyes, and we looked the same to them.” (Numbers 13:33). These are Anakim or Nephilim, the children of angels and human women, “When man began to multiply on the face of the land and daughters were born to them, the sons of God (angels) saw that the daughters of man were attractive. And they took as their wives any they chose. Then the LORD said, “My Spirit shall not abide in man forever, for he is flesh: his days shall be 120 years.” The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of man and they bore children to them. The...

Dispensationalism

John Nelson Darby (1800-1882) was a man who did two things, he took 70th week of the Book of Daniel and stretched out to the End Times, and he was the father of  Dispensationalism , a belief system that God dispenses different peoples with separate blessings and covenants. According to Darb'ys doctrine of Dispensationalism, God dispenses different covenants. There are total of seven dispensations that divide the history of man: I. Dispensation of Innocence (prior to the Fall, "Do not east of the Fruit of Good and Eve, Eden), II. Dispensation of Conscience ( You must assuage guilt and sin with blood sacrifices.) III. Dispensation of Human Government (Multiply and Subdue the world, example the Tower of Babel Gen 11:1-9, and Genesis 1:28). IV. Dispensation of the Promise (Dwell in Canaan, Jerusalem) V. Dispensation of the Law ("Obey the Law of Moses and the Prophets"). VI. Dispensation of Grace (The Church, Jesus Christ has come...

Jesus’ Name in Aramaic

There has been a trend to render Jesus’ name Hebrew, יֵשׁוּעַ , Yeshua. The problem is neither Christ nor his apostles, nor the Jews in 30-33 A.D. spoke Hebrew, they spoke Aramaic. A ramaic is the oldest language on earth and was the language Jesus spoke. In fact, the oldest Old Testament is the Septuagint a Greco translation around 132 B.C.E. (165 Years Before Christ)that was translated from Aramaic. The Masoretic Text, The Hebrew Old Testament most Bibles use, dates from 7th to 10th Century A.D. (Medieval Times).  This translation does not cross reference with the words of Christ in the New Testament which are Aramaic and Koine Greek.  If the Aramaic was what Jesus spoke, then by what name would have been called? Jesus’ name in Aramaic is Isho or Eesho, spelled ܝܫܘܥ . That is the name of our Lord in Aramaic! He would have heard his name in this dialect, “Hail Isho or Eesho!” as well as the Greek, Ἰ ησο ῦ ς , Iesous.  Aramaic is disappearing, only a few peop...