Skip to main content

The Red Letterists


The Red Letterists believe Jesus’ actual quoted words in red in the Gospels of Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, and Revelation are the most authoritative, and surpass in importance the epistles of Paul, Peter, John, and James.  This means when Jesus says, “But you are not to be called rabbi (teacher), for you have one teacher, and you are all brothers. And call no man your father on earth, for you have one Father, who is in heaven. Neither be called instructors, for you have one instructor, the Christ.  The greatest among you shall be your servant. Whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted,” (Matthew 23:8-11), but the apostles chose to separate people into teachers and servants / deacons, “So the Twelve summoned all the disciples and said, “It is unacceptable for us to neglect teaching the word of God in order to wait on tables.Therefore, brothers, select from among you seven men confirmed to be full of the Spirit and wisdom. We will appoint this responsibility to them and devote ourselves to prayer and to the ministry of the word,” (Acts 6:2-4), the Red Letterist chooses To live Christ’s words over the apostles. To be clear, all scripture is God breathed (2 Timothy 3:16), but the apostles admit that at times they decided things for themselves instead of waiting on the Lord, “It seemed good to us,” (Acts 15:28) and “Paul decided in his spirit.” (Acts 19:21). The apostles admit at times they chose their will over the Holy Spirit’s Will.  

The truth is the New Testament is God breathed (2 Timothy 3:26, 2 Peter 1:20-21), but at times the apostles make their own free will decision and admit when this happening in the words of Scripture. The Red Letterists choose to stick with Jesus’ quoted words, but I argue this requires some discernment. There are times when Jesus says things just for that person like the man who he told to sell all he had (Rich Young Ruler, Mark 10:17-21), or when he tests the apostles, “Seeing the man’s sadness, Jesus said, “How hard it is for the rich to enter the kingdom of God! Indeed, it is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.”
Those who heard this asked, “Who then can be saved?”
But Jesus said, “What is impossible with man is possible with God.” (Luke 18:24-27). We have to understand that in certain scenarios Jesus was addressing the hopeless state of man without salvation, and He had not yet died for sins on the cross, nor rose from the dead. So we must sift thru the words of Christ to find the universal words for all Christians  like John 3:16, John 10:27-30, and John 17:20-23, or those that were specific for an individual and that time such as the rich young ruler, because Christ did not ask rich Zacchaeus to sell all he had (Luke 19:1-10) and our Lord was supported by the rich women of Galilee (Luke 8:1-3). So the Monastic movement that believed poverty was necessary go follow Christ took the Rich Young Ruler out of context. 

I admire the Red Letterists, but I argue their downplay of the Pauline epistles is dangerous. Paul confronts many false gospels (Galatians 1:4-9), and urges a pure and simple devotion to Christ (2 Corinthians 13:2) and to count all lost but Christ (Philippians 3:8). What I do agree with is if there is deviation, like the comparison of what Jesus commanded about taking no titles, “But you are not to be called rabbi (teacher), for you have one teacher, and you are all brothers. And call no man your father on earth, for you have one Father, who is in heaven. Neither be called instructors, for you have one instructor, the Christ.  The greatest among you shall be your servant. Whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted,” (Matthew 23:8-11), and the apostles creating titles and removing the need to serve for teachers, “It is unacceptable for us to neglect teaching the word of God in order to wait on tables.Therefore, brothers, select from among you seven men confirmed to be full of the Spirit and wisdom. We will appoint this responsibility to them and devote ourselves to prayer and to the ministry of the word,” (Acts 6:2-4); then you stick with what Christ said.  


I admire the Red Letterists, but I believe the other epistles are divinely inspired and equally God Breathed too. But I totally get making red letters important, because they are the words of Jesus, our God Incarnate quoted and written down. Amen. 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dispensationalism

John Nelson Darby (1800-1882) was a man who did two things, he took 70th week of the Book of Daniel and stretched out to the End Times, and he was the father of  Dispensationalism , a belief system that God dispenses different peoples with separate blessings and covenants. According to Darb'ys doctrine of Dispensationalism, God dispenses different covenants. There are total of seven dispensations that divide the history of man: I. Dispensation of Innocence (prior to the Fall, "Do not east of the Fruit of Good and Eve, Eden), II. Dispensation of Conscience ( You must assuage guilt and sin with blood sacrifices.) III. Dispensation of Human Government (Multiply and Subdue the world, example the Tower of Babel Gen 11:1-9, and Genesis 1:28). IV. Dispensation of the Promise (Dwell in Canaan, Jerusalem) V. Dispensation of the Law ("Obey the Law of Moses and the Prophets"). VI. Dispensation of Grace (The Church, Jesus Christ has come...

Jesus’ Name in Aramaic

There has been a trend to render Jesus’ name Hebrew, יֵשׁוּעַ , Yeshua. The problem is neither Christ nor his apostles, nor the Jews in 30-33 A.D. spoke Hebrew, they spoke Aramaic. A ramaic is the oldest language on earth and was the language Jesus spoke. In fact, the oldest Old Testament is the Septuagint a Greco translation around 132 B.C.E. (165 Years Before Christ)that was translated from Aramaic. The Masoretic Text, The Hebrew Old Testament most Bibles use, dates from 7th to 10th Century A.D. (Medieval Times).  This translation does not cross reference with the words of Christ in the New Testament which are Aramaic and Koine Greek.  If the Aramaic was what Jesus spoke, then by what name would have been called? Jesus’ name in Aramaic is Isho or Eesho, spelled ܝܫܘܥ . That is the name of our Lord in Aramaic! He would have heard his name in this dialect, “Hail Isho or Eesho!” as well as the Greek, Ἰ ησο ῦ ς , Iesous.  Aramaic is disappearing, only a few peop...

The Potrait of Jesus: What Christ Looked Like

What was Jesus’s appearance? Pseudo-historians at National Geographic and other publications argue that Jesus’ humanity was of Arab or African descent. This is impossible because Jesus our God was Son of David according to His flesh, “He promised beforehand through His prophets in the Holy Scriptures, regarding His Son, who was a descendant of David according to the flesh, and who through the Spirit of holiness was declared with power to be the Son of God by His resurrection from the dead: Jesus Christ our Lord (God),” (Romans 1:2-4), and King David was described as the following, “So he sent and brought him in. Now he was ruddy [red, ruddy, from the word admowniy {ad-mo-nee'}; from 'adam ; reddish of the hair or the complexion red, ruddy], with beautiful eyes and a handsome appearance. And the LORD said, "Arise, anoint him; for this is he. So Samuel took the horn of oil and anointed him in the presence of his brothers, and from that day on the Spirit of the LORD came ...