Skip to main content

The High Stakes of the High Churches



Right now there is a wave of change hitting the high churches. From Anglican to Lutheran to Presbyterian and beyond, churches are throwing in their lot with either progressive or traditional leanings. Those who want to bend tradition and conform to modern morales and values have adopted rainbow colors while the more conservative use a navy or cobalt blue cross. The division in the high churches has bled into schisms and left those who have attended their local parish and home town church to ask some very tough questions. 

When these churches were founded , there principle masters and founders would have vehemently denounced the modern concessions to culture and the views of those who seek reforms that verge on sacrilege and are in defiance of both Scripture and tradition. Martin Luther, Zwingli, John Knox, and John Calvin would have ardently opposed such reforms with a vigor of a firebrand. It then is betwixing to watch the churches who carry their names and traditions defy the teachings of Scripture and their founders in order to appease the sensibilities of the times. 

Luther probably would have aptly said, “there is reform and then there is conform, the former routes error and leads us closer to God’s grace, while the latter taints our church with the stye of the world and leads us out of the Garden of Grace into disgrace.” This tendency to conform in the High Churches threatens to make null and void the purpose of the church on earth, to be a light in the darkness, to be a community that lets Christ shine to the nations.

One of the pressing reasons the high churches are coaxed into conformance is simply empty coffers and empty pews. 



Attendance of services is at an all time low across the world. In order to preserve against ruination, and the near constant closing of churches, parishes and diocese have endeavored to appeal to the young generation by relaxing standards and traditions that hold contempt for modern morality. This relaxation is not merely ordination of same sex priests, but greater ‘tolerance’ of cohabitation outside of the sacrament of marriage, silence on drugs and other addictive substances and their consequences. This new programme of ‘tolerance’ promises more coin in the coffer and more people in the pews at the expense of Scripture, God’s Spirit, and Genuine Christianity. The short term gain through conformity is a long term loss in sound doctrine and truth. 

The second motivation for this conform movement in high churches is to garner greater influence over society. Back in the Reformation Times churches had greater influence on society, even being promoted by monarchs and those in public offices of power. A hallmark since the times of Constantine the Great was an inclusion of Church and State. The church had sway on the lives of people and the government. Protestant Churches have since lost this and in an attempt to gain a seat at the table of power, they sacrifice to the gods and ideas of the day, failing to see that what meager and little influence they obtain, is ruined by the fact that they undermine their own principles and traditions and in effect make when they should achieve a voice, one that It hollow and no longer can advocate for their values and beliefs since they sold them cheaply to the world to gain their seat. 

The crisis in the high churches will not be self contained. The waves will and already have spread like ripples to the Catholic, Charismatic, Orthodox and even Evangelical pools. Each diocese and congregation will have to give an answer, will they conform or reform; will they sacrifice scripture and principles for short term gains or will they preserve the true faith and let Christ shine before the nations?  


The High Stakes the High Churches are waging is a fulfillment of scripture, “For the time will come when people will not put up with sound doctrine and teaching. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear,” (2 Timothy 4:3), and “They will act religious, but they will reject the power that could make them godly. Stay away from people like that!: having a form of godliness but denying its power” (2 Timothy 3:5 NLT). They exchange sound doctrine for solid numbers in the pews. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Israel’s Conquest of Canaan: The Nephilim and Giants

  Christianity Today asserts that the conquest of Canaan can be a “stumbling block” for believers. This probably is because of a foolish idea of comparing it to a modern conquest happening in our world. The truth is that God had Israel conquer Canaan because it was ruled by evil giants, “We saw the Nephilim there (the descendants of Anak come from the Nephilim). We seemed like grasshoppers in our own eyes, and we looked the same to them.” (Numbers 13:33). These are Anakim or Nephilim, the children of angels and human women, “When man began to multiply on the face of the land and daughters were born to them, the sons of God (angels) saw that the daughters of man were attractive. And they took as their wives any they chose. Then the LORD said, “My Spirit shall not abide in man forever, for he is flesh: his days shall be 120 years.” The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of man and they bore children to them. The...

Dispensationalism

John Nelson Darby (1800-1882) was a man who did two things, he took 70th week of the Book of Daniel and stretched out to the End Times, and he was the father of  Dispensationalism , a belief system that God dispenses different peoples with separate blessings and covenants. According to Darb'ys doctrine of Dispensationalism, God dispenses different covenants. There are total of seven dispensations that divide the history of man: I. Dispensation of Innocence (prior to the Fall, "Do not east of the Fruit of Good and Eve, Eden), II. Dispensation of Conscience ( You must assuage guilt and sin with blood sacrifices.) III. Dispensation of Human Government (Multiply and Subdue the world, example the Tower of Babel Gen 11:1-9, and Genesis 1:28). IV. Dispensation of the Promise (Dwell in Canaan, Jerusalem) V. Dispensation of the Law ("Obey the Law of Moses and the Prophets"). VI. Dispensation of Grace (The Church, Jesus Christ has come...

Jesus’ Name in Aramaic

There has been a trend to render Jesus’ name Hebrew, יֵשׁוּעַ , Yeshua. The problem is neither Christ nor his apostles, nor the Jews in 30-33 A.D. spoke Hebrew, they spoke Aramaic. A ramaic is the oldest language on earth and was the language Jesus spoke. In fact, the oldest Old Testament is the Septuagint a Greco translation around 132 B.C.E. (165 Years Before Christ)that was translated from Aramaic. The Masoretic Text, The Hebrew Old Testament most Bibles use, dates from 7th to 10th Century A.D. (Medieval Times).  This translation does not cross reference with the words of Christ in the New Testament which are Aramaic and Koine Greek.  If the Aramaic was what Jesus spoke, then by what name would have been called? Jesus’ name in Aramaic is Isho or Eesho, spelled ܝܫܘܥ . That is the name of our Lord in Aramaic! He would have heard his name in this dialect, “Hail Isho or Eesho!” as well as the Greek, Ἰ ησο ῦ ς , Iesous.  Aramaic is disappearing, only a few peop...