Skip to main content

Mona Christus



There is perhaps no painting more famous than Da Vinci’s Mona Lisa. People from around the world come to see her and speculate over what is the cause of her smile. I too have visited The Louvre and seen the woman whose mystique has captured the imagination of artists and laymen alike. Recently, I was perusing religious art and found a close up of Christ. The painting is a concentrated view of a larger altar piece of Jesus’ Ressurection. Flanked on either side of the Lord is the usual suspects, Mary Magadelene and the Apostle John. The close up however, reveal elements that are similar to the Mona Lisa. There is a landscape in the background which has the same forest green trees, hills, and a castle tower which seems to be not to disimilar to the castle towers of the Mona Lisa:






Had the Christ painting been a portrait and not a altar painting in three pieces I might have been in led to believe this was made by Da Vinci and that the Mona Lisa was a Madonna. The Christ portrait has the atypical symbolism of The Ressurection paintings. He is caped in a red robe which reminds us of His Passion and the robe the Romans bestowed upon Him at the crucifixion (John 19:5) and it harkens to when Jesus shall return again with a robe dipped in blood (Revelation 19:11-16). In the Lord’s hand is a crosiger (staff scepter) which for Catholics connects to the procession of the cross prior to the Eucharist and Mass, while for Protestants it alludes to the rod of iron that Christ shall crush the nations with upon His return (Revelation 19:11-16). In the background to the left is Golgotha or Mt. Calvary with three crosses, one being Christ’s and the other two being for the two criminals: “ Two others, both criminals, were led out to be executed with him. When they came to a place called The Skull, they nailed him to the cross. And the criminals were also crucified—one on his right and one on his left. Jesus said, “Father, forgive them, for they don’t know what they are doing.”And the soldiers gambled for his clothes by throwing dice.The crowd watched and the leaders scoffed. “He saved others,” they said, “let him save himself if he is really God’s Messiah, the Chosen One.” The soldiers mocked him, too, by offering him a drink of sour wine. They called out to him, “If you are the King of the Jews, save yourself!” A sign was fastened above him with these words: “This is the King of the Jews.”One of the criminals hanging beside him scoffed, “So you’re the Messiah, are you? Prove it by saving yourself—and us, too, while you’re at it!”But the other criminal protested, “Don’t you fear God even when you have been sentenced to die? We deserve to die for our crimes, but this man hasn’t done anything wrong.” Then he said, “Jesus, remember me when you come into your Kingdom.”And Jesus replied, “I assure you, today you will be with me in paradise.” (Luke 23:32-55)

The complexion of Christ is reminiscent of the Last Judgement scenes: 



Which is more neautral, neither a smile as in modern Christ paintings or a frown and angry glare as found in Eastern Orthodox Icons. There is a sense of genuine engagement from the Mona Lisa Christus painting; a welcoming to His open tomb. There is reverent feel to Jesus’s face and posture, but it does not feel cold and too regal to relate to as in the case of Medieval paintings.  The Mona Christus like the Mona Lisa leaves the viewer with the impression that there is much to understand about what is seen symbolically, however, the Mona Christus is more easily disciphered because it’s subject and portrait is of our Lord and God Jesus Christ, while Mona Lisa continues to haunt people with the mystery of her identity. 


The Mona Christus is an inspiring piece, making us wonder what Da Vinci could have painted had he used the same style as he did with the Mona Lisa.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Israel’s Conquest of Canaan: The Nephilim and Giants

  Christianity Today asserts that the conquest of Canaan can be a “stumbling block” for believers. This probably is because of a foolish idea of comparing it to a modern conquest happening in our world. The truth is that God had Israel conquer Canaan because it was ruled by evil giants, “We saw the Nephilim there (the descendants of Anak come from the Nephilim). We seemed like grasshoppers in our own eyes, and we looked the same to them.” (Numbers 13:33). These are Anakim or Nephilim, the children of angels and human women, “When man began to multiply on the face of the land and daughters were born to them, the sons of God (angels) saw that the daughters of man were attractive. And they took as their wives any they chose. Then the LORD said, “My Spirit shall not abide in man forever, for he is flesh: his days shall be 120 years.” The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of man and they bore children to them. The...

Dispensationalism

John Nelson Darby (1800-1882) was a man who did two things, he took 70th week of the Book of Daniel and stretched out to the End Times, and he was the father of  Dispensationalism , a belief system that God dispenses different peoples with separate blessings and covenants. According to Darb'ys doctrine of Dispensationalism, God dispenses different covenants. There are total of seven dispensations that divide the history of man: I. Dispensation of Innocence (prior to the Fall, "Do not east of the Fruit of Good and Eve, Eden), II. Dispensation of Conscience ( You must assuage guilt and sin with blood sacrifices.) III. Dispensation of Human Government (Multiply and Subdue the world, example the Tower of Babel Gen 11:1-9, and Genesis 1:28). IV. Dispensation of the Promise (Dwell in Canaan, Jerusalem) V. Dispensation of the Law ("Obey the Law of Moses and the Prophets"). VI. Dispensation of Grace (The Church, Jesus Christ has come...

Jesus’ Name in Aramaic

There has been a trend to render Jesus’ name Hebrew, יֵשׁוּעַ , Yeshua. The problem is neither Christ nor his apostles, nor the Jews in 30-33 A.D. spoke Hebrew, they spoke Aramaic. A ramaic is the oldest language on earth and was the language Jesus spoke. In fact, the oldest Old Testament is the Septuagint a Greco translation around 132 B.C.E. (165 Years Before Christ)that was translated from Aramaic. The Masoretic Text, The Hebrew Old Testament most Bibles use, dates from 7th to 10th Century A.D. (Medieval Times).  This translation does not cross reference with the words of Christ in the New Testament which are Aramaic and Koine Greek.  If the Aramaic was what Jesus spoke, then by what name would have been called? Jesus’ name in Aramaic is Isho or Eesho, spelled ܝܫܘܥ . That is the name of our Lord in Aramaic! He would have heard his name in this dialect, “Hail Isho or Eesho!” as well as the Greek, Ἰ ησο ῦ ς , Iesous.  Aramaic is disappearing, only a few peop...