Skip to main content

Colonailism: Christianity Spreds


Anti-colonailism is making major gains in places like Hawaii, Africa, and other places around the world. The Colonialists are being depicted as caravans that created everything from slavery to the most inhumane conditions in history. Part of this is funded and fueled by campaign called Globalism, a twist of word, being globally minded isn't wrong, but to harness rancor for the whites and to say colonialists are the devil actually is slight on the Church. When the Colonialists conquered the world via The British Empire, they brought in bowels of their ships the Gospel. Places like Burma, Canada, Cyprus, Egypt, India, Nigeria Africa, , and many other nations that had the Gospel arrived in early days of the Apostles (see Christianity is Cross Cultural post), were reinforced with bastion of Christianity, granted imperialist as it was presented. While I don't quite like the adage, "God is an Englishmen," [Actually God is a Hebrew, Jesus is Son of Abraham and Jesus is God who created Abraham see Matthew 1:1, John 8:48-59]. I want to present this thought, entire tribes and peoples, particularly in bush of Africa and poor regions of India had the Gospel come to them, as well as commerce and jobs. Poor Indians who were outcasts like The Untouchables became paid servants of British, and their families were able to survive famine thanks to English grain.

I am not saying Colonialists are innocent of wrong doing, or that there isn't error to find in some of their methods. Every period of history has its skeletons and bad chapters, and often we either take romantic or realist (pessimistic) view of entire centuries and millennium on the whim of historians and historical epics. One person can convince us that Ivan the Terrible was really not so terrible and beloved by all Russians, while another paints demonic character of Dante Inferno. What Colonialists did was pave the way for Gospel in more recent centuries. The Apostles like the Apostle Paul had laid the ground work for churches long ago, but the Protestant Colonial Missionaries risked life, limb, and their families to reach what the empire called "heathens". Protestant Missions really grew in this 1800s and beyond. Protestant Missionaries had to play catch up with the Roman Catholic evangelists known as Jesuits (Society of Jesus) had dared to venture into the bush to bring the Message to masses of tribesmen and agricultural families.

Colonialism is majorly under attack because the Progressive and Post Modern machine wants to attack Christianity. They want to make a case for the dark chapters of Colonialism while never showing the good chapters. It would be like us taking glimpse of Middle Ages and calling it as period of war, pestilence, and ignorance; instead of Renaissance of Sciences, Architectural wonders like Cathedrals, and innovations in both weapons and transportation (Susan Wise Bauer, The History of Renaissance World: From Rediscovery of Aristotle to the Conquest of Constantinople). It is easy for the liberal scholars to attack the Church through lens and proxy of Colonialism, citing that both the Church and Colonialism are symbiotic, and thus the Church is as guilty as Colonialism; and yet these same naysayers of the Colonialists will praise the Communist movements of the Marx Brothers, and the tree that created tyranny across Asia and Europe, one notable example being The Third Reich. Colonialism isn't perfect, but it did create God Fearing nation: The United States of America, and because of it the Gospel did stretch across the globe. The Thirteen Colonies that revolted in 1776 were established by Colonials, and so to attack Colonialism is also an attack on the U.S.A.

Think of it like this, would it have been better for tribesman to never heard Gospel and gone to hell, or to be part of Colonialism and encounter Christ and go to heaven (John 6:40)? Perhaps that is one of questions and chapters of Colonialism we should venture further into, while not forgetting anything man does is imperfect and prone to scrutiny in hindsight.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Israel’s Conquest of Canaan: The Nephilim and Giants

  Christianity Today asserts that the conquest of Canaan can be a “stumbling block” for believers. This probably is because of a foolish idea of comparing it to a modern conquest happening in our world. The truth is that God had Israel conquer Canaan because it was ruled by evil giants, “We saw the Nephilim there (the descendants of Anak come from the Nephilim). We seemed like grasshoppers in our own eyes, and we looked the same to them.” (Numbers 13:33). These are Anakim or Nephilim, the children of angels and human women, “When man began to multiply on the face of the land and daughters were born to them, the sons of God (angels) saw that the daughters of man were attractive. And they took as their wives any they chose. Then the LORD said, “My Spirit shall not abide in man forever, for he is flesh: his days shall be 120 years.” The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of man and they bore children to them. These w

Dispensationalism

John Nelson Darby (1800-1882) was a man who did two things, he took 70th week of the Book of Daniel and stretched out to the End Times, and he was the father of  Dispensationalism , a belief system that God dispenses different peoples with separate blessings and covenants. According to Darb'ys doctrine of Dispensationalism, God dispenses different covenants. There are total of seven dispensations that divide the history of man: I. Dispensation of Innocence (prior to the Fall, "Do not east of the Fruit of Good and Eve, Eden), II. Dispensation of Conscience ( You must assuage guilt and sin with blood sacrifices.) III. Dispensation of Human Government (Multiply and Subdue the world, example the Tower of Babel Gen 11:1-9, and Genesis 1:28). IV. Dispensation of the Promise (Dwell in Canaan, Jerusalem) V. Dispensation of the Law ("Obey the Law of Moses and the Prophets"). VI. Dispensation of Grace (The Church, Jesus Christ has come and died for our sins an

Jesus’ Name in Aramaic

There has been a trend to render Jesus’ name Hebrew, יֵשׁוּעַ , Yeshua. The problem is neither Christ nor his apostles, nor the Jews in 30-33 A.D. spoke Hebrew, they spoke Aramaic. A ramaic is the oldest language on earth and was the language Jesus spoke. In fact, the oldest Old Testament is the Septuagint a Greco translation around 132 B.C.E. (165 Years Before Christ)that was translated from Aramaic. The Masoretic Text, The Hebrew Old Testament most Bibles use, dates from 7th to 10th Century A.D. (Medieval Times).  This translation does not cross reference with the words of Christ in the New Testament which are Aramaic and Koine Greek.  If the Aramaic was what Jesus spoke, then by what name would have been called? Jesus’ name in Aramaic is Isho or Eesho, spelled ܝܫܘܥ . That is the name of our Lord in Aramaic! He would have heard his name in this dialect, “Hail Isho or Eesho!” as well as the Greek, Ἰ ησο ῦ ς , Iesous.  Aramaic is disappearing, only a few people are endeavo