Why We Only Have 66 Books of the Bible

There is popular belief held that we Protestants abridged The Bible, removing books in an aim to protest the Church of Rome. The Roman Catholic Bible contains 73 books, while our Bibles contain only 66 books. It would seem at a glance that books were removed, but they have not.

In truth the Protestant canon of 66 is traditional and has a longer precedence. Both Catholic and Protestant Bibles contain 27 books of the New Testament, which means the difference is in the Old Testament. The Catholic bibles contain the deuterocanonical (second canon) also known as the apocryphal (doubtful authenticity) books such as Tobit, 1 and 2 Maccabees, Sirach (wisdom), Ecclesiasticus, and more. These apocryphal books are not in the ancient Hebrew canon, and were debated for centuries. In fact, Catholic fathers like Jerome rejected these extra books because they were not in the Old Testament scrolls of the Jews.

So if the deuterocanonical books are disputed and not in the most trusted copies of the Old Testament, why do Catholics have them in their bibles? The answer was The Council of Trent. The Romanite Church made the apocryphal books part of their canon because apocryphal passages in 1 Maccabees affirm their prayers to the dead when the New Testament says, “And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:” (Hebrews 9:27). In fact, a reason the deuterocanonical books were rejected is they contradict the Old and New Testament Trusted Scriptures, and thus were thrown out.

The 66 Book Canon is the right one. It is the most ancient in precedent and tradition. We can them been assured our Protestant Bibles are accurate, because the Old Testament is the one used throughout history, not the Council of Trent’s invention. You can have confidence that 66 is the right number, and trust they are the oracles of God. Amen.

Source & Further Reading:

https://textandcanon.org/why-the-catholic-bible-has-more-books-than-the-protestant-bible/

Comments

Israel’s Conquest of Canaan: The Nephilim and Giants

Christianity Today asserts that the conquest of Canaan can be a “stumbling block” for believers. This probably is because of a foolish idea of comparing it to a modern conquest happening in our world. The truth is that God had Israel conquer Canaan because it was ruled by evil giants, “We saw the Nephilim there (the descendants of Anak come from the Nephilim). We seemed like grasshoppers in our own eyes, and we looked the same to them.” (Numbers 13:33). These are Anakim or Nephilim, the children of angels and human women, “When man began to multiply on the face of the land and daughters were born to them, the sons of God (angels) saw that the daughters of man were attractive. And they took as their wives any they chose. Then the LORD said, “My Spirit shall not abide in man forever, for he is flesh: his days shall be 120 years.” The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of man and they bore children to them. These w

Dispensationalism

John Nelson Darby (1800-1882) was a man who did two things, he took 70th week of the Book of Daniel and stretched out to the End Times, and he was the father of Dispensationalism , a belief system that God dispenses different peoples with separate blessings and covenants. According to Darb'ys doctrine of Dispensationalism, God dispenses different covenants. There are total of seven dispensations that divide the history of man: I. Dispensation of Innocence (prior to the Fall, "Do not east of the Fruit of Good and Eve, Eden), II. Dispensation of Conscience ( You must assuage guilt and sin with blood sacrifices.) III. Dispensation of Human Government (Multiply and Subdue the world, example the Tower of Babel Gen 11:1-9, and Genesis 1:28). IV. Dispensation of the Promise (Dwell in Canaan, Jerusalem) V. Dispensation of the Law ("Obey the Law of Moses and the Prophets"). VI. Dispensation of Grace (The Church, Jesus Christ has come and died for our sins an

Jesus’ Name in Aramaic

There has been a trend to render Jesus’ name Hebrew, יֵשׁוּעַ , Yeshua. The problem is neither Christ nor his apostles, nor the Jews in 30-33 A.D. spoke Hebrew, they spoke Aramaic. A ramaic is the oldest language on earth and was the language Jesus spoke. In fact, the oldest Old Testament is the Septuagint a Greco translation around 132 B.C.E. (165 Years Before Christ)that was translated from Aramaic. The Masoretic Text, The Hebrew Old Testament most Bibles use, dates from 7th to 10th Century A.D. (Medieval Times). This translation does not cross reference with the words of Christ in the New Testament which are Aramaic and Koine Greek. If the Aramaic was what Jesus spoke, then by what name would have been called? Jesus’ name in Aramaic is Isho or Eesho, spelled ܝܫܘܥ . That is the name of our Lord in Aramaic! He would have heard his name in this dialect, “Hail Isho or Eesho!” as well as the Greek, Ἰ ησο ῦ ς , Iesous. Aramaic is disappearing, only a few people are endeavo

A Knight's Blog

Search This Blog