Skip to main content

The Only Pope I Quote

Cross of Canterbury
It is no secret that I am Reformed. That I hold to the Holy Scriptures and believe the Gifts of the Holy Spirit are for today. I tend to be very critical of the Roman Catholic Church. I find many of the practices in the Romanite Church to be deuterocanonical, and as Luther called them “extravagandic.” The doctrines of penance, purgatory, and prayers & veneration (worship) of the Virgin Mary and the Saints are stripped of legitimacy by only s handful of verses: 

“be found in him, not having a righteousness of my own that comes from the law, but that which is through faith in Christ--the righteousness that comes from God on the basis of faith” (Philippians 3:9) 

“And just as each person is destined to die once and after that comes the judgment” (Hebrews 9:27)

“There is one God and one mediator between God and mankind, the Son of Man Christ Jesus,” (1 Timothy 2:5) 

“Jesus replied, "The Scriptures say, 'You must worship the LORD your God and serve only him.” (Luke 4:8) 

I could quote countless verses that confronts the vow of chastity and celibate priests (1 Timothy 4:2-3), the scandals of pedophilia (Matthew 18:16), that you should never take vows at all (Matthew 5:34-37), that praying the Pater Noster (Our Father) over and over is confronted by Jesus (Matthew 6:7-8), that wearing flashy priest garb was mocked by Christ (Matthew 23:5-7), that the Eucharist is not Jesus continuing to offer himself over and over for sin but Had offered Himself once for sin (Hebrews 7:27, Hebrews 9:26), that salvation is not penance but given upon faith and belief in Christ and His grace (John 3:16, John 6:40, Romans 10:9-10, Acts 4:10-12, Acts 15:11), that you should never call anyone priest or father (Matthew 23:7-11), and that it was St. Paul who we can prove went go Rome (Acts 28:11-31), not Peter. In point of fact, it would seem the RCC read the Scriptures and made everything from their dress and doctrine the opposite of what Jesus and His Apostles taught! 

I can deconstruct the entire Roman Catholic Church with Scripture. Hence why I have remained Reformed and trust only in Christ and His Scriptures (Philippians 3:8-9, 2 Corinthians 11:2, 2 Timothy 3:16). However, I happen to have Roman Catholic friends and occasionally I find some sayings said by early Romanite theologians and clergy that I find useful. One particular saying that I applaud is a response from Pope Gregory to Augustine of Canterbury (a Benedict Monk, not Augustine of Hippo): 

Augustine of Canterbury’s third question: Since there is but one faith, why are the uses of Churches so different, one use of Mass being observed in the Roman Church, and another in the Churches of Gaul?

Answer of the blessed pope Gregory: Your Fraternity knows the use of the Roman Church, in which you have been nurtured. But I approve of your selecting carefully anything you have found that may be more pleasing to Almighty God, whether in the Roman Church or that of Gaul, or in any Church whatever, and introducing in the Church of the Angli, which is as yet new in the faith, by a special institution, what you have been able to collect from many Churches. For we ought not to love things for places, but places for things. Wherefore choose from each several Church such things as are pious, religious, and right, and, collecting them as it were into a bundle, plant them in the minds of the Angli for their use.” (From The Eccleiastical History of the English Speaking People, Book I, Chapters 29-33, Bede, Penguin Publishers, or Fathers of the Church, Registrum Epistolarum, Book XI, Letter 64). 

I love Gregory’s reasoning, that the Almighty Trinity may reveal some finer points and practices to one church and other points and practices to another, “But I approve of your selecting carefully anything you have found that may be more pleasing to Almighty God, whether in the Roman Church or that of Gaul, or in any Church whatever.” (Pope Gregory). This passage should have been inscribed on Martin Luther’s 95 Thesis and other works as he argued for reform! It would have been a great means fto sway Catholics into Protestant thinking. 


The words of Pope Gregory are ecumenical, “Wherefore choose from each several Church such things as are pious, religious, and right, and, collecting them as it were into a bundle, plant them in the minds of the Angli for their use.” We could be serves well if instead of seeing the Church as only our sect and instead see ourselves as a Familia Christi, and learn the best from each denomination and utilize it: example, be charismatic like Pentecostals or Southern Baptists, be charitable like the Catholics, be humble like the Eastern Orthodox, be Scriptural like the Baptists, be staunch on grace and salvation through faith like the Lutherans, and etc. Instead of calling each other heretics (though we can say to those we disagree what we think and even say that’s heterodox teaching) we could heed Gregory’s advice to take the best from each church and use it. And anything that contradicts Scripture (Old and New Testaments) and the teaching of Christ and His apostles be spat out like lukewarm water (Revelation 3:16). Amen. 




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Israel’s Conquest of Canaan: The Nephilim and Giants

  Christianity Today asserts that the conquest of Canaan can be a “stumbling block” for believers. This probably is because of a foolish idea of comparing it to a modern conquest happening in our world. The truth is that God had Israel conquer Canaan because it was ruled by evil giants, “We saw the Nephilim there (the descendants of Anak come from the Nephilim). We seemed like grasshoppers in our own eyes, and we looked the same to them.” (Numbers 13:33). These are Anakim or Nephilim, the children of angels and human women, “When man began to multiply on the face of the land and daughters were born to them, the sons of God (angels) saw that the daughters of man were attractive. And they took as their wives any they chose. Then the LORD said, “My Spirit shall not abide in man forever, for he is flesh: his days shall be 120 years.” The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of man and they bore children to them. These w

Dispensationalism

John Nelson Darby (1800-1882) was a man who did two things, he took 70th week of the Book of Daniel and stretched out to the End Times, and he was the father of  Dispensationalism , a belief system that God dispenses different peoples with separate blessings and covenants. According to Darb'ys doctrine of Dispensationalism, God dispenses different covenants. There are total of seven dispensations that divide the history of man: I. Dispensation of Innocence (prior to the Fall, "Do not east of the Fruit of Good and Eve, Eden), II. Dispensation of Conscience ( You must assuage guilt and sin with blood sacrifices.) III. Dispensation of Human Government (Multiply and Subdue the world, example the Tower of Babel Gen 11:1-9, and Genesis 1:28). IV. Dispensation of the Promise (Dwell in Canaan, Jerusalem) V. Dispensation of the Law ("Obey the Law of Moses and the Prophets"). VI. Dispensation of Grace (The Church, Jesus Christ has come and died for our sins an

Jesus’ Name in Aramaic

There has been a trend to render Jesus’ name Hebrew, יֵשׁוּעַ , Yeshua. The problem is neither Christ nor his apostles, nor the Jews in 30-33 A.D. spoke Hebrew, they spoke Aramaic. A ramaic is the oldest language on earth and was the language Jesus spoke. In fact, the oldest Old Testament is the Septuagint a Greco translation around 132 B.C.E. (165 Years Before Christ)that was translated from Aramaic. The Masoretic Text, The Hebrew Old Testament most Bibles use, dates from 7th to 10th Century A.D. (Medieval Times).  This translation does not cross reference with the words of Christ in the New Testament which are Aramaic and Koine Greek.  If the Aramaic was what Jesus spoke, then by what name would have been called? Jesus’ name in Aramaic is Isho or Eesho, spelled ܝܫܘܥ . That is the name of our Lord in Aramaic! He would have heard his name in this dialect, “Hail Isho or Eesho!” as well as the Greek, Ἰ ησο ῦ ς , Iesous.  Aramaic is disappearing, only a few people are endeavo