Skip to main content

Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit *Major Spoilers*



I grew up on Tom Clancy films and video games. My father was an avid reader of Clancy's novels. To me Jack Ryan will always be Harrison Ford. Ford portrayed Ryan in "Patriot Games" and "Clear and Present Danger." While Alic Baldwin was descent in "The Hunt for Red October," I think Ford did a better job of potraying the analyst side of Jack Ryan than Baldwin or Ben Affleck in the "Sum of All Fears."

It has been twelve years since Ryan was on the big screen. The new rookie to play this famous espionage character is Chris Pine. When I first heard that Pine would play Jack Ryan, I was optimistic because of his performance in "This Means War." In contrast, when I learned that Keira Knightly would be playing Cathy Muller, Ryan's soon to be wife, I was skeptical. Mrs. Knightly tends to play very odd roles and frankly I cannot shake the image of her from "The Pirates of Caribbean: At World's End" or "Anna Karenina." Mrs. Knightly reminds me of Tim Burton's wife. She has a very morbid and sensual presence on screen. Suffice to say she was the last person I would have thought they would pick for Ryan's wife.

The beginning of Jack Ryan: Shadow Agent starts when Ryan is at university and notices everyone is uneasy on campus. He makes his way into the hall were students are surrounding a TV watching The Trade Towers smoking on September 11th, 2001. Ryan then apparently overcome with patriotism and a zeal to bring to justice those responsible for the terrorist attack, he signs up for the Marines. It is during a routine patrol via helicopter that Ryan is shot down and is severely injured. Ryan with his spinal column broken must go through eight months of rehab were he meets Cathy who he falls in love with. Nearing the end of his rehab he meets Thomas Harper (Kevin Costner), who evidently is looking for a new recruit for the C.I.A. Ryan wanting to serve his country agrees to head to Wall Street and spy on Russian accounts and report back to Harper.

In middle of this we are introduced to the villain of the film, Viktor Cherevin played by Kenneth Branagh. Viktor is a Russian involved in global economics and who has plan to sabotage America's Economy and make Russia rich. Ryan is assigned to Russia when he realizes that there are major accounts full of millions and that the American dollar is still rising despite global economic chaos. Ryan arrives in Russia and survives an  assassination attempt and discovers Viktor Cherevin plan.

In between all the action is the subplot of Ryan and Dr. Muller. The romantic drama is very cheesy and frankly it is hard to take Mrs. Knightley's performance seriously. The whole "I think Ryan is having an affair but I find out he's CIA" is cliché and not very amusing to watch. Mrs. Knightley's subpar acting does not help either.

The plot itself is straight from the Cold War but it takes place in a post 9/11 setting. From what I can devise the writers decided to use Clancy's "Cardinal in Kremlin" and the Ryan Origin Story as pieces of the story. unfortunately rather than follow the plot of those books, the story only uses parts of them and rebuilds them in a different plot. In fact, it is this mixture that does a disservice to the film. Rather than just adapt "Cardinal in Kremlin" and tell the fascinating space wars or Star Warts story of the Cold War, the writers tried desperately to make it modern. What is puzzling is that George Clooney is make good money doing WWII films and no one seems to be bothered that it is set in another era. In fact, with the plethora of espionage films being the present or future, it would have been refreshing to go back in time to the Golden Age of espionage.

Overall, Jack Ryan: Shadow Agent is a descent film. It is not the Jack Ryan I remember. It feels very much like "This Means War" without the humor. Chris Pine basically carries the film. Kevin Costner is good, but not great. Costner plays the stereotypical mentor who gives fatherly advice like he did in "Man of Steel." Keira Knightly as I said is poor, she brings nothing to the film except being a damsel in distress, which after seeing her in The Pirates of the Caribbean franchise it is difficult to suspend your disbelief. Kenneth Branagh brings a solid performance as Viktor. He is your typical Russian villain, but he is convincing until the scene when he is going to use a florescent light bulb to torture and kill Cathy Muller.

If you are fan of Clancy's books, I think you will be disappointed. If you are fan of the earlier Jack Ryan films you will be disappointed. If you enjoyed "The Sum of All Fears" with Ben Affleck, I think you will be disappointed. There was a chance to resurrect the Ryan franchise, but poor writing and bad casting destroyed that hope.

Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit is not horrible. If you forget it is a Ryan film, it is actually a mediocre film. In fact, it compares with "A Good Day to Die Hard" which did not feel like Die Hard film either. It is almost as if Hollywood has lost all It's creativity and the sequels are just aimed at getting nostalgic fans to the box office to see their favorite characters. Action films now are being released without developed characters or plot. As a result we get basically the same film over and over again. Perhaps Christopher Nolan has ruined action films for us and because of his deep story lines we expect more from the action genre. Whatever the case, Jack Ryan: Shadow Agent is rent worthy at best. I suggest you forgo seeing it in theaters and save your money for an upcoming film.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Israel’s Conquest of Canaan: The Nephilim and Giants

  Christianity Today asserts that the conquest of Canaan can be a “stumbling block” for believers. This probably is because of a foolish idea of comparing it to a modern conquest happening in our world. The truth is that God had Israel conquer Canaan because it was ruled by evil giants, “We saw the Nephilim there (the descendants of Anak come from the Nephilim). We seemed like grasshoppers in our own eyes, and we looked the same to them.” (Numbers 13:33). These are Anakim or Nephilim, the children of angels and human women, “When man began to multiply on the face of the land and daughters were born to them, the sons of God (angels) saw that the daughters of man were attractive. And they took as their wives any they chose. Then the LORD said, “My Spirit shall not abide in man forever, for he is flesh: his days shall be 120 years.” The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of man and they bore children to them. The...

Dispensationalism

John Nelson Darby (1800-1882) was a man who did two things, he took 70th week of the Book of Daniel and stretched out to the End Times, and he was the father of  Dispensationalism , a belief system that God dispenses different peoples with separate blessings and covenants. According to Darb'ys doctrine of Dispensationalism, God dispenses different covenants. There are total of seven dispensations that divide the history of man: I. Dispensation of Innocence (prior to the Fall, "Do not east of the Fruit of Good and Eve, Eden), II. Dispensation of Conscience ( You must assuage guilt and sin with blood sacrifices.) III. Dispensation of Human Government (Multiply and Subdue the world, example the Tower of Babel Gen 11:1-9, and Genesis 1:28). IV. Dispensation of the Promise (Dwell in Canaan, Jerusalem) V. Dispensation of the Law ("Obey the Law of Moses and the Prophets"). VI. Dispensation of Grace (The Church, Jesus Christ has come...

Jesus’ Name in Aramaic

There has been a trend to render Jesus’ name Hebrew, יֵשׁוּעַ , Yeshua. The problem is neither Christ nor his apostles, nor the Jews in 30-33 A.D. spoke Hebrew, they spoke Aramaic. A ramaic is the oldest language on earth and was the language Jesus spoke. In fact, the oldest Old Testament is the Septuagint a Greco translation around 132 B.C.E. (165 Years Before Christ)that was translated from Aramaic. The Masoretic Text, The Hebrew Old Testament most Bibles use, dates from 7th to 10th Century A.D. (Medieval Times).  This translation does not cross reference with the words of Christ in the New Testament which are Aramaic and Koine Greek.  If the Aramaic was what Jesus spoke, then by what name would have been called? Jesus’ name in Aramaic is Isho or Eesho, spelled ܝܫܘܥ . That is the name of our Lord in Aramaic! He would have heard his name in this dialect, “Hail Isho or Eesho!” as well as the Greek, Ἰ ησο ῦ ς , Iesous.  Aramaic is disappearing, only a few peop...