Skip to main content

The Price of Priesthood



There are many in God's flock that take a salary to minster his Word. Preachers, pastors, priests, popes, bishops, cardinals, and minsters. These men have sworn themselves to the service of the Savior. They are supported by the saints and given a salary to sustain their livelihood. However, the question is if this is just? Paying priests has existed since the Levite Priesthood. Originally, the Israelites would tithe a portion of their grain, oxen, or commodity to the Temple. The priests would take a share to live on, while storing the rest in houses for famine and other catastrophes. Today we do much of the same, only the clergy doesn't put a portion aside for the security of the sons of God. Can you imagine if your Church were to take the collected tithe and put it in an account for emergencies? If a brother or sister in the Lord were in dire straights, revenue could be requisitioned and given to them from the store house or account. It would be money put to much better use than building an addition for worship or collecting to funds to make fine coffee and pastries available. What if the tithe was used to help the living Church and not the cathedral and programs? That would be a novel idea. It would be returning to the Early Church, when the Gentile Christians collected money to help the Jewish Christians in Jerusalem (2 Corinthians 8:1-4).

Paying priests is a subject of great controversy. I frankly feel a conflict of interest by taking money to spread the Gospel. It turns out that I'm not the only one. The Apostle Paul said, "I would rather die of starvation than lose the satisfaction I get from preaching to you without charge." (1 Corinthians 9:15, TLB). Paul addresses the Church of Corinth about them providing for preachers and other Apostles. He gets quite full of vehemence over the fact that Corinthian Christians pay and provide food and clothing for other preachers like Peter, but neglect to help him and Barnabas because they have their own businesses. However, Paul then realizes that there is bondage in taking a salary to preach the Gospel. He says, "I am not bound to obey anyone just because he pays my salary; yet I have freely and happily become a servant of any and all so that I can win them to Christ." (1 Corinthians 9:19, TLB). Here Paul has touched on the great danger that looms over all clerics who take money to serve the Lord.

With money comes influence. If someone is paying you to do something, they have a yoke over you. They have a web of control. If you don't preform or preach what they want, they can take your provision away or threaten you. If you take salary to sow the seed of the Gospel, you cannot freely share the message without the approval of those whom support you. This is the great travesty in the Church today. Many men and women of God are marginalized and kept from speaking the Truth because the board who pays them doesn't want to hear messages of conviction or prophecy that would compel them to change their ways. This is why Jesus says, "You can only serve one of two masters, you can serve either God or Mammon (god of money)." (Matt 6:24, Luke 16:13). The truth is most pastors and parishioners are trying to serve both Jesus and a Jury. Preachers must balance their service to God and to the people who control their salary. This door for manipulation is eliminated if we like Paul refuse to take money to Move Mountains and spread the message of our Lord. We aren't compelled to obey man if we freely serve Christ.

If we take a check or a coin for conveying the compassion of Christ, we open the door to Mammon and can be controlled by those who serve him. Money is not evil, but with it comes ties that can defy what Jesus Christ is calling his children to do. Ultimately, pastors and priests will have to make a choice. Will they do as God wills and risk losing their livelihood? or will they bend their knee to the Prince of Banking and thus systematically destroy their integrity and calling in the Lord? There is no middle ground, you can't serve two masters and the problem with the American Church is it is trying to appease both the Trinity and the god of money. Unfortunately, it is Mammon that tends to be worshipped and honored. While the saints sing to their savior, they build a temple and altar to the god of money. Something must be done to set free those who believe from the control of money and man. The answer lies in the Apostle Paul's letter to the Corinthians. He is a model of how to be freely ministering in Christ. The answer is responsibility. Get a job! Solomon (Eccl 6:7) and Paul said, "If man will work, he may eat; if he do not work, he neither can eat, nor should he eat." (2 Thessalonians 3:10). Stop being like this entitlement society! Get up from your pew or papal seat and provide for your own needs so that you can freely serve God! Cease taking bribes and become bold for Jesus Christ! It's time priesthood have a price! That we have to sacrifice comforts for Christ! Be set free and start walking in God's Will instead of Mammon's Bill.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Israel’s Conquest of Canaan: The Nephilim and Giants

  Christianity Today asserts that the conquest of Canaan can be a “stumbling block” for believers. This probably is because of a foolish idea of comparing it to a modern conquest happening in our world. The truth is that God had Israel conquer Canaan because it was ruled by evil giants, “We saw the Nephilim there (the descendants of Anak come from the Nephilim). We seemed like grasshoppers in our own eyes, and we looked the same to them.” (Numbers 13:33). These are Anakim or Nephilim, the children of angels and human women, “When man began to multiply on the face of the land and daughters were born to them, the sons of God (angels) saw that the daughters of man were attractive. And they took as their wives any they chose. Then the LORD said, “My Spirit shall not abide in man forever, for he is flesh: his days shall be 120 years.” The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of man and they bore children to them. The...

Dispensationalism

John Nelson Darby (1800-1882) was a man who did two things, he took 70th week of the Book of Daniel and stretched out to the End Times, and he was the father of  Dispensationalism , a belief system that God dispenses different peoples with separate blessings and covenants. According to Darb'ys doctrine of Dispensationalism, God dispenses different covenants. There are total of seven dispensations that divide the history of man: I. Dispensation of Innocence (prior to the Fall, "Do not east of the Fruit of Good and Eve, Eden), II. Dispensation of Conscience ( You must assuage guilt and sin with blood sacrifices.) III. Dispensation of Human Government (Multiply and Subdue the world, example the Tower of Babel Gen 11:1-9, and Genesis 1:28). IV. Dispensation of the Promise (Dwell in Canaan, Jerusalem) V. Dispensation of the Law ("Obey the Law of Moses and the Prophets"). VI. Dispensation of Grace (The Church, Jesus Christ has come...

Jesus’ Name in Aramaic

There has been a trend to render Jesus’ name Hebrew, יֵשׁוּעַ , Yeshua. The problem is neither Christ nor his apostles, nor the Jews in 30-33 A.D. spoke Hebrew, they spoke Aramaic. A ramaic is the oldest language on earth and was the language Jesus spoke. In fact, the oldest Old Testament is the Septuagint a Greco translation around 132 B.C.E. (165 Years Before Christ)that was translated from Aramaic. The Masoretic Text, The Hebrew Old Testament most Bibles use, dates from 7th to 10th Century A.D. (Medieval Times).  This translation does not cross reference with the words of Christ in the New Testament which are Aramaic and Koine Greek.  If the Aramaic was what Jesus spoke, then by what name would have been called? Jesus’ name in Aramaic is Isho or Eesho, spelled ܝܫܘܥ . That is the name of our Lord in Aramaic! He would have heard his name in this dialect, “Hail Isho or Eesho!” as well as the Greek, Ἰ ησο ῦ ς , Iesous.  Aramaic is disappearing, only a few peop...